Crucified with Jesus: Two Criminals

A few days ago, I started writing this on a few scraps of paper through my theology class, and I don’t think I’ve heard a message that focused the crucifixion like this.  Specifically, I want to look at the two criminals that were also crucified alongside Jesus.

I think this is crucial to understanding salvation, and Jesus’ desire to restore humanity.  In Luke 23:39-43, we read that one of the criminals mocks Jesus, meanwhile the other defends him.  Here it is (in the New American Standard):

One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!”
But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation?  And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.”  And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!”
And [Jesus] said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

First, I want to point out that Jesus died for both of them.  This isn’t universalism; it doesn’t mean that Jesus’ sacrifice saved all humanity, and we can continue to live however we want.  It means Jesus’ crucifixion is an open invitation, and it’s almost certain between technology and missionaries, that knowledge of Jesus’ sacrifice is available.

Second, Jesus didn’t condemn the criminal who mocked Him to hell.  There is this strange rumour going around that God sends people to hell; Jesus is God.  I’ll expand on this in a moment or so (depending on how fast you read, of course).

Third, Jesus loved the criminal who defended Him.  To understand this, let’s look at the bigger context.  If you stood up for Jesus, especially when He’s nailed to a cross right beside you, people are going to mock you more.  I know that isn’t big, as the criminal was about to die anyway, but I’m sure (s)he would want to die with as much dignity as possible.  Also, at this point on the cross, there is an audience throwing insults, laughs, and maybe even objects at you already.  The criminal obviously knew who Jesus was, too.  The final words we hear from the criminal was “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!”  I don’t know how well this criminal knew Jesus, but (s)he understood Him to be God (“Do you not even fear God?”).  Jesus essentially responded to the criminal’s request at the end with, “You’re coming with me!”  I also want to go on a quick tangent; To recognize God, you need God (ah yes, the paradox!).  Check out Matthew 16:13-17.

So, what’s up with this whole condemned to hell thing that people have so much trouble digesting?  People believe that God has a check-list of every human being, and He likes some of them, so they go into heaven, the rest go into hell.  This isn’t true, and in fact, it’s the reverse.  Because of God’s holiness, He cannot be in sin, and humanity is in sin.  Through some form of transmission, we all sinned in Adam.  I can’t explain that one, but according to the Bible, it’s fact, so I’ll leave it up to you to discern how that happened.  But, because we are in sin and we are inclined to sin, we cannot go into heaven.  This has nothing to do with God liking some people and disliking others.  It has to do with all humanity being destined to hell.  This is why we have to come to faith in Jesus; In Christ, He bore our sin at the cross as a worthy sacrifice unto Himself (He obeys His own Law).  Until we identify ourselves in Jesus, we are stuck in Adam.  When we put our identity in Jesus, our sin cannot enter into that relationship with us, so it is put onto Christ.  Because Christ is eternal, then he bares that sin on the cross. This doesn’t mean that we cannot sin any more, but what it does mean is that there is no longer a barrier to our communing relationship with Jesus.  I have difficulty believing that sin no longer interrupts my relationship with God, but I know that I know that it is true.

If you are new to this, I know it’s a lot to process, and I encourage you to sort this out.  You are free to comment on this, and I’d like to help you sort this out.  I’m not going to tell you the theology you are supposed to leave, but if you have honest questions, I’ll answer them the best I can with scripture and my own personal experience (if applicable).  You may find this page worth investigating, too.

Happy Easter!


4 thoughts on “Crucified with Jesus: Two Criminals

  1. ** Amazingly Graceless

    The 1-god of the Big-3 theisms has many exponents who speak for it. Just as well, it will never speak itself — except as a ventriloquist’s dummy.

    Iran puts monomaniacal clerics in control of a mullah-based dictatorship with the Shia styled Allah as dummy. The Vatican puts monomaniacal clerics in control of a bishop-based dictatorship with the RC styled God as dummy. In Ameristan fundies want to put monomaniacal clerics in control of a fascist dictatorship with the fundie-styled God as dummy.

    “God” protects its beloved mullahs, bishops, and “C” Street Family congressmen with supernatural threats of damnation. The Cosmic Avenger will not be serving up “God’s” retribution. “He’s” just another Big-Lie of the Big-3. The Cosmic Avenger belongs to comix noir.

    All 1-god bombast derives from pulp fiction comix. Apologists weaponize any “verse” no matter how forced, out-of-context, or perverse it may be to advance their political agendas.

    Their ancient shopworn lines, written, altered, and interpreted by countless ventriloquists, are endlessly shouted at mind numbing volume by today’s dueling dummies.

    Faith, as the willing suspension of disbelief, has always been theater of the absurd.

    1. Hi, anti_supernaturalist,
      I don’t mind you expressing your beliefs, but not when it’s out of context with the post, not to mention I have nothing to do with Roman Catholicism, Muslim, or Ameristan (never heard of that).
      I brought no verse out of context, and if you didn’t notice, I put links to the verses so you can examine them for yourselves. I said nothing about damning anyone to hell, and have absolutely no political agenda.
      And to top things off, I don’t understand what the point of your comment is. It looks like you just copied/pasted random ideas.
      Please explain yourself, or I am going to mark your post as spam.

  2. Why?

    I’m not trying to attack your religion, and I will try to be as respectful as possible but I cannot and never have been able to understand religion.

    In your article you make many statements about the universe and present them as facts yet have neither evidence, observations or anything, other than that you personally believe them to be true, to back them with.

    This does not make them wrong, but it makes telling them to others a seemingly pointless exercise. If the reader disagrees with you then there is no reason for them to change or re-examine their point of veiw and if they agree then all that can be established is that you both agree.

    For example I could state that in heaven the grass is blue. You may agree or disagree, but nothing more than that can be gained from my statement.

    In order for any meaningful theological communication to take place each writer must try to find common premises with the reader (or more commonly, persude the reader to accept their premises on the grounds of shared observations) then build on the premises to reach a conclusion.

    This website is clearly Chrisitian orientated and I feel I need to say that I did not deliberatly come here to try and convert or change anyone’s beliefs. I just pressed the stumble button, read your article and decided to comment.

    1. Hey, Blue,
      First, I greatly respect your position and how you approached your statement.
      As far as the information in my article, my goal isn’t to convert but to inform. All of my information is from about 3 years of Biblical study, both in English and in Greek, and some of it is relatively common among Christian beliefs, so I have no real need to back it up. I don’t expect or desire people to blindly accept information, but I think people should be capable of searching for truth from the information I give them. If they disagree, that’s not my responsibility, and I am happy with people disagreeing because I respect opinions. I never call my opinion the only and the right, but I do find it terrible when people counter my statements and say it is completely trash (don’t worry, you’re not guilty of that, and I greatly appreciate that).
      The most important information, for me, is letting people know that Jesus is real, is God and was resurrected, which this post didn’t focus completely on, so I didn’t put a lot into referencing. You likely don’t believe in Jesus (maybe even don’t believe He existed), and likewise, many people that stumbleupon across this site aren’t, which is why I post multiple articles, so people can browse, read, and understand that these are my biblical and theological convictions (hence, my exploration of Christianity).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s